« Not-So-Giant Rock Alert! | Main | Museums: Behind the Scenes »

October 08, 2008

Comments

Mr. Cavin

I recognize that my comment is chillingly pedantic, and I am certain you know all of it already. But I see this gloss on literary history often enough that I feel the record needs a little straightening, if only for someone who’s writing a paper and suddenly finds themselves here.

During the dreary and wet summer of 1816, while hanging out at the Villa Diodati on Lake Geneva, the four young writers challenged one another to write horror stories. Percy Shelly, as you say, began something he never set to paper. Mary began the thought processes that eventually led her to Frankenstein. Lord Byron, who had, three years before, began a formal literary interest in traditional folkloric Vampirism in his Orientalist epic poem The Giaour, actually wrote the first several pages of an ostensible vampire story. It was notable in that it portrayed the central monster, which was normally a bloated bloody corpse, as an aristocrat named Augustus Darvell. Having read these pages, there is little evidence of more than a pervasive sinister existentialism about Darvell, but we have Mrs. Shelly’s assertion that a vampire was what he was meant to be. We are not privy to the same airy discussions the young quartet were having around the Swiss campfires on those evenings. I always thought this was pretty neat, that Byron himself was somehow responsible for the arch romanticizing of this common villager’s folkloric bugaboo. Byron was such a sexy jerk.

Sadly, Byron, whose attention span was probably never all that, and who was actively putting pen to paper for the third canto of Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage, never bothered finishing the story. This is where poor Dr. Polidori comes in. The doctor took that enigmatic story snippet and ran, authoring the Vampire. Again, according to the opinions of those present, this story ran more or less according to Byron’s initial ideas, though Polidori went so far as to fashion his aristocratic protagonist, Lord Ruthven, after Byron himself. But it is important to note that this was, according to everyone involved, including John William Polidori himself, Byron’s idea made manifest through the doctor’s later tinkering. Three years later, as a matter of fact: the Vampire wasn’t published until 1819.

So what did Dr. Palidori actually manage to create over those wet summer nights in Switzerland? I like how Mary Shelly puts it best, so here she is:

“Poor Polidori had some terrible idea about a skull-headed lady who was so punished for peeping through a keyhole—what to see I forget: something very shocking and wrong of course; but when she was reduced to a worse condition than the renowned Tom of Coventry, he did not know what to do with her and was obliged to dispatch her to the tomb of the Capulets, the only place for which she was fitted.”

Man, what a sentence! And what a drive-in B-side, too. I’d really like to have read that story. Imagine if he’d persisted and finished it, imagine also that Polidori’s taste-making sway then held firm: we’d live in a wonderful world with nineteenth century books about, and Universal and Hammer Film Studios versions depicting, and teen angst allusions to, and Loony Toons send-ups of, and pre-code comic books about, and Wax Museum sculptures illustrating, and millions on millions of trick or treating kids all dressing up and plodding about as a skull-headed woman. Sigh.

Cambias

Thanks for a very informative comment! It sounds as if Polidori's original story would have been perfect for a comics adaptation by Fletcher Hanks: http://www.toonopedia.com/fantomah.htm

The comments to this entry are closed.

About Us

  • Diane A. Kelly
    Diane Kelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, where she studies the neural wiring and mechanical engineering of reproductive systems.
  • James L. Cambias
    Jim Cambias writes science fiction and designs games in the lonely wilderness of Western Massachusetts.

Awards